No conspiracy theory needed to explain the short squeeze during the scheduled maintenance of Bitmex

Bitcoin is more resilient than stocks to technical glitches in the exchanges, because stocks are traded on 1-2 exchanges (sometimes only 1), but Bitcoin is traded on many exchanges, like fiat currencies (Forex).

I think that the Bitmex downtime had some role (when it was offline arbitrage bots was offline too, causing liquidity to decrease and make short squeeze more probable), but most journalists and "Bitcoin analysts" will exaggerate it.

If Bitmex did not went down to maintenance, it's very probable that the short squeeze would happened anyway. Short positions to long positions ratio on Bitfinex were at record high (see "BTCUSDSHORTS-BTCUSDLONGS" on TradingView).

No conspiracy theory is needed to explain the short squeeze. It's obvious for all market participants that the best time for short squeeze is when the liquidity is low and short positions on Bitfinex (one of the major spot exchanges allowing shorting on margin) are at record high.

This is why "smart money" started to open long positions around the time when liquidity is expected to be low (during the Bitmex scheduled maintenance around 40% of the liquidity was missing) and short positions at record high level. No conspiracy, nothing special, just plain heavy market buy orders.

When Bitmex is down the arbitrage bots are also down (or should be if their creators are wise). This additionally decrease the liquidity on other major exchanges.

It was obvious that the short squeeze would happen while 40% of liquidity is missing, so it was self-fulfilling prophecy.

No need of conspiracy theory, all market participants who placed "buy" orders to take advantage of the short squeeze were the cause of the event, not "someone".

The Bitmex maintenance was scheduled. So, it wasn't insider trading. Everyone could have traded it, so it was a pure technical reaction.

It was obvious that the best time for short squeeze is when the big futures exchange is down (and the arbitrage bots giving liquidity to other exchanges).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do not use (only) flash memory (SSD drives, hardware wallets, USB flash drives) for your precious private keys!

Image
Flash memory is not a reliable medium for archives. Especially when there is no regular power. I have personal experience with usb flash drive not powered for weeks - one file became corrupted . (Read more here: Archiving private keys - TLDR version. ) You should always back up on paper and other mediums. Flash memory is prone to failure if it is not powered for weeks or more and if there are ionizing radiation When you write your precious private keys you should use technologies like Parchive and ZFS . And make several copies of your files. It's OK if you use your USB flash drive for another backup, but don't rely on it! Always back up on DVDs (even small files!), paper and online (after encryption with CPU and RAM intensive key derivative function like scrypt). Here is example of using the scrypt utility: $ sudo apt-get install scrypt $ scrypt enc -M 1073741824 -t 200 secret.txt encrypted.scrypt Do not use default values of "-M" and "-t", they...
Read more

Archiving private keys - TLDR version

0. Make multiple encrypted copies. On DVDs (they are better than CDs and Blu-Ray discs; DVD+R are better than DVD-R), paper, cloud services like DropBox, OneDrive, Google Drive, e-mail it to yourself and to your friends, use P2P storage services like MaidSafe, Storj and Sia , etc. 1. Use proper font when printing PGP encrypted keys on paper. 2. Flash memory (SSD, USB flash drives, hardware wallets) is less reliable when not powered regularly (i.e. every week). 3. Use error correction methods like Parchive and ZFS. 4. Print on paper or store on digital media only encrypted data. 5. Your encryption software should use CPU/RAM-intensive KDF (i.e. scrypt with secure options - do not use defaults! ). First, encrypt with scrypt and then encrypt it again with PGP (using different password!) in ASCII armor mode before print it (other methods like QR codes may not be reliable as multiple copies of the PGP ASCII armor). Do not use the same password for the PGP because it's easy to brute...
Read more
[ad removed]